City Health International


With City Health 2019 in Melbourne now only weeks away, a headline in the papers caught my eye. According to the annual Global Liveability Index- whose criteria include stability, healthcare, culture, education, environment, and infrastructure- the Austrian capital Vienna narrowly beats Melbourne to the top spot. Of course, such rankings are open to debate and dependent on what you choose to measure but it’s fair to say the occupants of city halls take a degree of pride in seeing “their” cities topping the charts.

Culture and entertainment contribute much to the fabric of a city, to their popularity as holiday destinations, and locations to set up businesses. Judged by overnight visitors Bangkok, Paris, and London are top of the global league. These three combine wonderful historic sites and a vibrant night time economy. In London, many visitors want to see St Pauls, Tower Bridge, and Buckingham Palace. Fish and chips (there are other options) in a traditional pub is also popular. But many also want to go out at night; visit the theatres, see a band, dance all night and perhaps see the sun come up over the river Thames. Not a bad way to spend a few days and most of us will have treasured memories of long nights in a big city. But maintaining a city’s vibrant Night Time Economy (NTE) while keeping visitors and residents safe can often be a source of conflict.

At their root many of these problems are linked to intoxication. This links to crime, the fear of crime, burden on ambulances and hospitals, street cleaning, noise and the impact on residents and workers. Concentrations of drunken people can be unpleasant and intimidating. Drunk people are a danger to themselves and a nuisance to those around them. In response our focus in the NTE tends to be on managing premises which sell alcohol, trying to limit drunkenness, the associated violence and anti-social behaviour. This can easily and understandably lead to responses which reduce outlets, the number of drinkers and so, hopefully, lead to a reduction in problems. However, the reality can see undesirable outcomes, especially at a time when many urban centres are already experiencing a loss of other outlets. It is also possible to close down “problem” venues and see problems worsen in totally unregulated or unlicensed settings resulting in increased harm to individuals and communities. Rundown areas with less people passing through can be just as daunting and problematic for civic authorities and residents as those filled with bars and fast food outlets. They don’t attract visitors or investment.

But as many cities have demonstrated it’s not an either/or situation. It can be helpful to recognise the NTE sector is not just about alcohol or other intoxicants. At the end of 2018 the Greater London Authority published an evidence base for a 24-hour city

This takes a deliberately broad interpretation of “night”, from 6pm to 6am, and in doing so it helps to consider those who work, not just those who socialise at night. One of the findings it highlighted was that while fear of crime is higher at night the reality is the risk is no higher, though there are, of course, peaks and troughs across any 12-hour period and certain days of the week. Since 2010/11 alcohol related offences have significantly fallen (approximately 50%), they make up just over 4% of all crime in this period (caveat about peaks and troughs repeated). Additionally, the report produces some interesting data about the levels of poor pay to be found amongst those working at night. It also highlights that those in lower income groups have the greatest concerns about crime.

A report like this raises a lot of issues, and researcher colleagues will be pleased to note the need for additional studies and more data is highlighted. But it does provide valuable context for those of us working to improve safety at night in our cities. London, like many other major cities, now has a Night Czar and this helps provide a focus as well as opportunities to share developments and ideas. This is important given London comprises 33 local authorities, which each have their own licensing and planning teams, in addition we have three police forces significantly involved in law enforcement within our NTE. Of course, some boroughs barely have anything resembling a traditional NTE centre, while others, such as Westminster, attract hundreds of thousands a year from across the globe. However, all are increasingly looking to maximise the benefits, economic, cultural and social of having a night time economy which includes, theatres, cinemas, bowling alleys, restaurants, coffee shops, sports centres, art galleries, shopping centres including well run and regulated venues offering alcohol.

Not every city or area gets its right all the time. Sometimes there are external factors which see plans go awry but my sense is London is making real progress in managing to balance the demands for, and benefits of, a vibrant night time economy with the need to keep people safe and minimise negative impacts on communities. We know that good licensing practice reduces hospital admissions. We have a developing body of good practice which demonstrates that local authorities and police can work with venues to reduce crime and other problems without having to result to closure – though this can be necessary on occasion. There is scope for improvement, health colleagues have much to offer in developing a more nuanced understanding and response to local problems. Other stakeholders should be included to ensure we have a true 360 degree understanding of NTE impacts. Better use of data should support quicker and more effective responses.

If we get it right in London, we might not take the top spot from Vienna or Melbourne next year, but it is an important part of maintaining it as a major world city, and of being a healthier place to live and visit. Meanwhile, as Melbourne and its social scene come highly recommended, I look forward to seeing it at first-hand and learning about the experience of other cities.









Wednesday, January 15, 2020
So here we are: 2020. Let me start by wishing all of you the very best for the year ahead. I have, occasionally, been accused of an inclination toward cynicism and a failure to look on the bright side of things. So, for my first blog of the year, at least, I am going to be determinedly upbeat. You can judge for yourself how long it lasts. This sense of optimism is influenced by the fact that the end of 2019 saw some positive signs in the world of substance misuse. While it was something of a mad scramble against time, we managed to pull together a high quality and well-supported pan-London Christmas alcohol campaign. I am very grateful to colleagues who delivered the key elements of this work and to everyone who supported it. Some, in fact, went well beyond the call of duty to engage with our colleagues in the blue light services. Although we will not have any data in terms of its reach and impact for some months (I will update you), what I can confidently say is that many individuals and organisations liked the messaging and tone. I like to think it is helping contribute to Londoners having a more considered and healthier relationship with alcohol, though there is a way to go yet!
Wednesday, December 18, 2019
It has been a little while since I managed to produce a blog. Workwise things have been especially hectic as we end the year. Not least in helping get another London Christmas alcohol campaign organised. You can see the resource produced here . Early next year I will share our experience of this year’s campaign. Looking back 2019 has been a year when the headlines relating to drugs have been consistently negative. Record drug related deaths, some worrying prevalence data, growing concerns around crime and financial pressure on service delivery. On the positive side there is some sense that drug issues are getting back on to the agenda. Hopefully this will continue. A personal highlight of 2019 was getting to hear and speak with so many fascinating people at City Health Melbourne.
Wednesday, October 30, 2019
When I hosted the first City Health conference in 2012, my hope was we might manage three or four events in different cities. I never dreamt we’d get to nine (and counting) or that City Health would reach the great city of Melbourne. Great credit must go to the Progressive Public Health Alliance for hosting a fascinating two days that provided energy, enthusiasm and challenge. Personally, I learnt a great deal and found myself questioning somehow of my own views. I met people doing amazing things in the most challenging environments. I heard of situations that made me feel a sense of despair but came away reassured that we have the knowledge, networks and commitment to positively change lives for the better.
Monday, September 23, 2019
Sometimes things just work out. Last Monday, I was involved in three separate events which each highlighted the potential of urban areas to effectively tackle health issues when there is political leadership to do so. The day also provided a timely reminder of the importance of harm reduction, and how this needs to be at the heart of health approaches in our cities. With so many countries and agencies forgetting the lessons of harm reduction, or actively turning their back on them for narrow ideological reasons, it was uplifting to hear examples which delivered quantifiable gains in terms of lives, better health, and human rights.



CHI Melbourne 2019

Read more

CHI Liverpool 2019

Read more

CHI Odessa 2018

Read more

CHI Basel 2017

Read more

CHI London 2016

Read more

CHI Barcelona 2015

Read more

CHI Amsterdam 2014

Read More

CHI Glasgow 2013

Read More

CHI London 2012

Read More

City Health International
Founded in 2012 City Health International is a network of individuals and organisations engaged in the study of and response to structural health issues and health behaviours in the urban environment.
For the first time in history the majority of the world’s population now live in urban environments and the proportion continues to grow. As national governments struggle to deal with the pressures and demands of growing urban populations against a backdrop of financial deficits and uncertainty, it is increasingly left to those working at a city level to provide the leadership and support needed to tackle key health issues.